Power Systems AdvisorGet a Power Cloud Assessment

IBM i Cloud & Hosting

Cloud and Hosting Options for IBM i Workloads

Compare IBM Power Virtual Server, managed IBM i hosting, private cloud, colocation, disaster recovery, and hardware refresh options for IBM i environments.

Independent analysis — not tied to a single cloud provider, hardware vendor, or systems integrator.

What are the main hosting options for an IBM i workload?

There's no universal answer — the right path depends on your workload profile, licensing terms, application support requirements, data center geography, target architecture, and the provider's contract terms. IBM Power Virtual Server, managed IBM i hosting, private cloud, colocation, disaster recovery as a service, and a straight hardware refresh each trade off control, cost predictability, and migration effort differently.

Workload Discovery

What to inventory before you choose a path

A clear picture of the current environment prevents surprises later in licensing, application support, and cutover timing.

OS and technology refresh level

Current IBM i release and Technology Refresh (TR) level, plus how close the environment is to IBM's end-of-support dates.

LPAR inventory

Every logical partition (LPAR), its processor and memory entitlement, and how workloads are split across partitions.

DB2 for i

Database size, journaling configuration, and any replication or high-availability dependencies tied to DB2 for i, the integrated relational database built into IBM i.

BRMS and backup strategy

How Backup, Recovery and Media Services (BRMS) policies, retention schedules, and save windows are configured today.

Network dependencies

Subsystem connections, VPN tunnels, and latency-sensitive integrations that a new hosting location must preserve.

Third-party application support

Whether independent software vendor (ISV) applications are certified to run on the target OS release, cloud, or hosting platform.

Options at a Glance

How IBM i hosting and cloud options compare

Each path trades off control, cost structure, and migration effort differently. Suitability depends on your workload, licensing, application support, geography, architecture, and provider terms.

How the six options compare at a glance
OptionBest fit when…Key considerations
IBM Power Virtual ServerYou want IBM infrastructure without owning hardware, with fast provisioning of new LPARs.Consumption pricing, region availability, and connectivity back to on-premises systems.
Managed IBM i hostingYou want a provider to operate the OS, BRMS, and patching so your team focuses on applications.The provider's IBM i version support, service-level agreement (SLA) terms, and how much administrative access your team retains.
Private cloudYou need dedicated infrastructure with more control than a shared managed service.Higher setup effort and ongoing capacity planning versus a fully managed option.
ColocationYou want to keep owned hardware but exit an aging or costly data center.You still own the hardware refresh cycle and the OS/BRMS administration burden.
Disaster recovery as a serviceProduction stays in place but needs a modern, tested recovery posture.Recovery time objective (RTO) and recovery point objective (RPO), replication method, and test frequency.
Hardware refreshApplication or contractual constraints make relocation impractical right now.Capital cost, lead time, and whether the refresh simply delays a future migration decision.

Decision Aids

Key decision points for IBM i moves

Best fit

When IBM Power Virtual Server or managed hosting fit best

If the goal is to exit a hardware refresh cycle while preserving IBM i application compatibility, these two paths typically require the least application change.

Use caution

Where IBM i moves run into trouble

Licensing entitlement transfer, ISV certification gaps, and underestimating BRMS and backup redesign are common sources of delay. Plan for all three during discovery, not cutover week.

Key decision

Modernize now or relocate first?

Relocating the current environment preserves timeline and budget predictability. Modernizing addresses technical debt but extends the project. Many organizations phase the two rather than choosing one outright.

Migration Approach

A phased path for moving or refreshing an IBM i environment

Downtime and validation are usually the top concerns for IBM i teams — a phased approach keeps both controlled.

  1. 1

    Discovery and assessment

    Inventory LPARs, DB2 for i databases, BRMS policies, network dependencies, and third-party application certifications.

  2. 2

    Target environment design and sizing

    Right-size processor, memory, and storage entitlements for the destination platform based on current utilization.

  3. 3

    Migration planning and test cutover

    Build a runbook, define maintenance windows, and validate the move in a non-production test cutover before committing to a date.

  4. 4

    Production cutover and validation

    Execute the cutover against the runbook, then validate application function, performance, and data integrity before releasing users.

  5. 5

    Post-migration operations

    Confirm backup, high availability (HA), and disaster recovery (DR) are operating as designed, and decide what ongoing administration shifts to managed services versus your team.

What drives IBM i cloud and hosting costs

For IBM i Administrators

Questions your technical team will ask

IBM i administrators tend to focus on the mechanics of the move itself.

IBM i version and TR compatibility

Does the target platform support your current IBM i release, or does the move force an OS upgrade first?

LPAR migration mechanics

How are logical partitions moved, resized, or consolidated, and what's the fallback if a partition doesn't behave as expected?

BRMS and backup continuity

Do existing BRMS policies carry over, or does backup and recovery need to be redesigned for the new environment?

Licensing entitlement transfer

Which licenses move with the workload, and which need to be repurchased or renegotiated?

Performance and interactive capacity

Will interactive job and batch performance match or improve on the new platform under real workload conditions?

Downtime and application compatibility

How long is the cutover window, and have third-party applications been validated against the target environment?

For CIOs and Directors

Questions leadership will ask

Chief Information Officers (CIOs) and IT directors weigh cost, continuity, and strategy more than migration mechanics.

Cost predictability

Does the option convert unpredictable capital refresh cycles into a forecastable operating expense, or introduce new variability?

Business continuity posture

Does the move improve or risk current recovery time and recovery point objectives during the transition and afterward?

Modernization roadmap alignment

Does relocating the workload now support or delay a longer-term application modernization strategy?

Provider and exit risk

How portable is the environment afterward, and what does it take to change providers again if terms or service quality change?

Frequently asked questions about IBM i cloud and hosting

What is the best cloud option for IBM i?

There isn't a single best option — it depends on your IBM i release level, DB2 for i database size, licensing terms, application support requirements, and how much administrative control your team wants to keep. IBM Power Virtual Server and managed IBM i hosting are common starting points for teams that want to reduce hardware ownership without re-platforming applications.

Should we modernize or just relocate the IBM i workload?

Many organizations relocate first to exit a hardware refresh cycle or improve continuity, then modernize specific applications over time. Whether to combine or sequence the two depends on budget, timeline pressure, and how much technical debt the current applications carry.

How much downtime should we expect during an IBM i migration?

Downtime depends on database size, replication method, and how much testing precedes the cutover. A non-production test cutover before the production event is the most reliable way to get a realistic estimate for your environment.

Does our IBM i and DB2 for i licensing transfer to a new provider?

It depends on the license terms and the target platform. Some licenses are tied to specific hardware serial numbers or processor groups, so confirm transferability with IBM and any third-party software vendors before committing to a timeline.

Will our third-party applications keep working after a move?

Only if they're certified on the target IBM i release and platform. Confirming independent software vendor (ISV) certification should be one of the first steps in discovery, not something left until cutover weekend.

What's the difference between IBM Power Virtual Server and managed IBM i hosting?

IBM Power Virtual Server is IBM's own cloud infrastructure offering. Managed IBM i hosting typically layers a third-party provider's operational support — patching, BRMS administration, monitoring — on top of infrastructure that may or may not be Power Virtual Server itself. The two are not mutually exclusive.

Sources

Assess Your IBM i Environment

Get a clear, vendor-neutral view of which hosting option fits your IBM i workload, licensing, and continuity requirements before you commit to a provider.